Immigration Reform a Path Forward?
Trump and Vance Announce Revised Immigration Framework
Broken Immigration System
Real Immigration Reform – A Way Forward
Immigration Reform a Path Forward?
Immigration Reform a Path Forward?
Trump and Vance Announce Revised Immigration Framework
Broken Immigration System
Real Immigration Reform – A Way Forward
The Trump–Vance Administration may be forced to announce a major strategic change in immigration policies. Here’s what I would like to see in such a revamping of their policies.
The bottom line is simply this
At this point, the Administration must confront a simple reality: it is neither practical nor morally defensible to deport millions of undocumented immigrants who are already woven into the fabric of American life. Many undocumented individuals—and immigrants more broadly—perform essential work across the U.S. economy. From a humanitarian standpoint, it is also unreasonable to remove undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, particularly when there is no evidence of marriage fraud. And the image of masked armed agents kidnapping people off the street, shooting protestors dead, and teargassing children not to mention breaking down doors are a PR nightmare and can not continue. If you don’t want people to call you gestapo, then you should stop acting like the gestapo. It is UnAmerican.
Here are the key ideas distilled into a short summary
- The U.S. immigration system has been dysfunctional for decades and urgently needs modernization.
• Deporting all undocumented immigrants is neither realistic nor humane; many perform essential jobs.
• Families should not be separated when there is no evidence of fraud, especially spouses of citizens and LPRs.
• Like the Reagan-era approach, the U.S. should recognize reality and provide a path to permanent residency, including for Dreamers.
• The system should be simplified with fewer, clearer categories, updated requirements, and modern electronic processing.
• The F4 and Diversity Visa programs should be phased out while creating fair transition rules for those already in the pipeline.
• All new pathways to legal status should include basic English proficiency, education standards, and clean criminal backgrounds.
I have followed immigration issues for decades, both personally and professionally. During my years as a U.S. Government consular officer—including five years working as an immigration fraud officer—I saw firsthand how deeply broken, outdated, and overloaded our immigration system has become. It has not functioned well for a very long time, and the need for fundamental reform has grown only more urgent. We have been here before. President Reagan recognized reality and provided a legalization pathway for those already living in the United States. It is time to show the same clarity and courage today, including offering a path to permanent residency for Dreamers and other long-‑term undocumented residents.
Here are some of my proposals, which I hope will be taken seriously as part of a broader effort to modernize and simplify the system.
The system needs to be significantly streamlined. We have far too many outdated categories that no longer reflect economic needs, humanitarian priorities, or modern mobility patterns.
The F4 sibling category should be abolished going forward, but those already in line should be allowed to proceed by notifying the U.S. Government that they wish to continue and completing all required processing within two years.
The Diversity Visa program should also be phased out. All immigrants— including those who would receive a new pathway to legal status—should meet minimum English-language criteria, possess at least a high-school-level education, and have no criminal background.
Most nonimmigrant visas should be processed electronically. First-time applicants would still visit a U.S. embassy or consulate for biometric collection and a brief interview, but approvals would be issued electronically afterward. Renewals should be completed online without additional interviews. This approach should apply to all visa categories and would dramatically reduce workload and wait times.
A shift in its immigration approach, outlining a new framework intended to balance enforcement with pragmatic pathways to lawful status. The proposal introduces updated enforcement priorities, streamlined visa categories, and a modernized system for both immigrant and non‑immigrant admissions.
1. Enforcement and Humanitarian Provisions
Under the proposal, undocumented immigrants who meet specific criteria will be permitted to apply for temporary status that may later convert to lawful permanent residency (LPR) and eventual citizenship. Eligible applicants must:
- Have no criminal record
• Demonstrate English proficiency
• Maintain employment
• Demonstrate established ties to their community
Applicants will be required to report to DHS within six months to initiate processing.
ICE operations will be refocused toward removing individuals convicted of serious crimes. Consistent with long‑standing practice, ICE officers will not conduct enforcement at schools, churches, courts, or public events. The Administration has indicated that existing Temporary Protected Status (TPS) programs will remain in place for the time being.
The Administration intends to base a comprehensive legislative proposal on the last bipartisan immigration reform bill, with modifications reflecting current conditions.
The Diversity Visa (DV) program will be phased out.
2. Reforms to Immigrant Visa Categories
Family‑ and employment‑based immigration categories will be consolidated into five simplified classifications:
- Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens and LPRs
Limited to spouses, parents, and unmarried children under 21 - Employment‑Based Immigrants
Divided into three subcategories:
– Executive/managerial
– Skilled
– Unskilled - Investment‑Based Immigrants
- Religious Workers
- Special Categories as determined by statute
The F4 sibling category will be eliminated moving forward. Those currently in the F4 backlog will have one year to register their intent to proceed and one additional year to complete processing. Applicants will need to demonstrate English language proficiency, a minimum of a high‑school education, and relevant work experience.
Certain serious medical conditions (e.g., cancer, AIDS, MS, tuberculosis) may be grounds for inadmissibility, though waivers may be available. Sexually transmitted infections will result in a temporary exclusion pending completion of treatment.
3. Reforms to Non‑Immigrant Visa Categories
The non‑immigrant visa system will be reorganized as follows:
A — Diplomatic
B — Senior‑level executive travel; B1/B2 intra‑company transfers (INA 214(b) does not apply)
C1 — Tourist
C2 — Business travelers (214(b) applies); includes short‑term work assignments necessary for business operations
D — Temporary workers (skilled, unskilled, and agricultural); 214(b) does not apply; eligible to adjust to LPR status after three years of continuous employment, English proficiency, and a clean record
E — Student visas; graduates with qualifying job offers may adjust status to LPR from within the U.S.; 214(b) does not apply
F — Exchange visitors; may adjust status upon program completion; 214(b) does not apply
G — Performers and athletes, including Olympic participants and individuals joining U.S. teams; eligible to adjust to LPR after one year of employment with a U.S. team or sponsor; 214(b) does not apply
I — Investment visas requiring a minimum $500,000 investment; may adjust to LPR after three years of sustained business viability
R — Religious workers; may adjust to LPR after three years of service
J — Journalists; eligible to adjust to LPR after three years of service
4. Modernized Processing and Administration
- 90% of all visas will be processed through expanded electronic authorization systems.
• First‑time applicants will provide biometric data at U.S. consulates, followed by a streamlined interview.
• Renewals will be completed electronically when possible.
• Per‑country numerical limits will be abolished.
PART 2 — ANALYSIS AND CONTEXT
A. Summary of Major Immigration Reform Proposals (2007–2026)
Across two decades, major reform proposals have generally centered on:
- Border security enhancements (physical barriers, personnel increases, technology upgrades)
• Interior enforcement (E‑Verify, detentions, deportation priorities)
• Legalization pathways for long‑term undocumented residents
• Modernization of employment‑based immigration
• Changes to asylum law
• Backlog reduction via staffing and structural changes
Notable proposals include:
2007 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA) — combined enforcement with a path to citizenship; failed in the Senate.
2013 Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act — the “Gang of Eight” bill; passed the Senate but died in the House.
2024–2025 proposals — numerous bipartisan negotiations collapsed amid partisan disagreement, especially around emergency border shutdown authority.
2025 Dignity Act — proposed renewable lawful status for long‑term undocumented residents plus strong border measures.
B. The Last Major Bipartisan Comprehensive Bill
The most recent fully negotiated bipartisan bill was the Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (February 2024).
It included:
- Additional border barriers and detention beds
• Expanded staffing for asylum officers and immigration judges
• Faster asylum adjudication
• Tougher standards for asylum eligibility
• Large increases in fentanyl interdiction funding
• Foreign‑aid funding for Ukraine and Israel
The bill failed in the Senate after heavy opposition from Republican leadership.
C. Press Coverage Across the Political Spectrum
Left‑leaning outlets generally emphasize humanitarian concerns, due‑process issues, asylum protections, and the risks of aggressive enforcement.
Common themes: court‑backlog consequences, concerns about detention, and critiques of expedited removal.
Center‑left/centrist outlets (AP, Bloomberg, major networks) focus on factual reporting:
• system backlogs
• operational changes
• legislative deadlock
• economic impacts of immigration flows
Right‑leaning outlets highlight:
• border security failures
• increased encounters
• enforcement gaps
• the need for restrictive asylum policies
International press emphasizes:
• U.S. political volatility
• Effects on global migration flows
• Diplomatic implications
• Labor‑market and demographic impacts
D. Visa Issuances, Five‑Year Trends
Non‑immigrant visas recovered sharply after COVID and exceeded pre‑pandemic levels:
- FY2023: 10.4 million
• FY2024: 10.97 million (highest ever recorded)
Immigrant visas remained relatively stable from 2020–2024, averaging around 700k–1.1 million per year.
E. Immigration Backlogs and Wait Times
- USCIS pending cases (2025): 11.3 million
• Immigration court backlog (late 2025): 3.7 million cases
• Average immigration court wait time: ~4 years
• Longest family‑based queues (F1, F2B, F3, F4): 7–22+ years, depending on country
• Employment‑based processing often requires 1–3 years, depending on category and demand
• Naturalization processing reduced modestly to ~5.5 months avg. in 2024–25
F. Have Visa Numbers Declined Since the Start of Trump’s Second Term?
Based on available data (2023–2025 and early 2026):
- Non‑immigrant visas: No — they remained historically high (2024 was a record year).
• Immigrant visas: Mixed — slight declines in some categories due to backlog pressure, not policy cuts.
• Asylum and humanitarian processing: Declines observed due to policy slowdowns and suspensions.
Overall, no evidence suggests a broad decline in routine visa issuances driven solely by the administration.
G. Probability of Immigration Reform in the Near Term
Prospects remain low, based on:
- A sharply divided Congress
• Party disagreement over sequencing (enforcement first vs. comprehensive approach)
• Presidential election dynamics
• Senate filibuster constraints
• Prior bipartisan negotiations repeatedly collapsing under political pressure
However, targeted reforms (border security funding, limited employment‑based changes, TPS adjustments) remain possible.
“Sources and Further Reading: Press Coverage Across the Spectrum”
LEFT & LEAN‑LEFT COVERAGE
AllSides – “Shaping the Narrative: How Major Media Outlets Cover Immigration”
A data‑driven breakdown of how left‑leaning outlets frame immigration issues.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/blog/shaping-narrative-how-major-media-outlets-cover-immigration
[allsides.com]
Pew Research Center – Biden‑era Immigration Coverage
Compares story volume and tone across political audiences.
URL:
CNN Politics – Immigration News Page
Consistent coverage of immigration, deportations, asylum rules, and humanitarian issues.
URL:
https://www.cnn.com/politics/immigration
[cnn.com]
The Conversation – Immigration Policy Research & Commentary
Academic‑oriented articles on immigration, migration flows, and policy impacts.
URL:
https://theconversation.com/topics/immigration-policy-6888
[theconversation.com]
CENTER / NEUTRAL COVERAGE
AllSides Immigration Topic Page
Aggregates balanced headline roundups with stories from multiple viewpoints.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/topics/immigration
[allsides.com]
JSTOR – “Coverage and Framing of Immigration Policy in U.S. Newspapers”
Peer‑reviewed analysis on how mainstream newspapers frame immigration policy.
URL:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/48663967
[jstor.org]
RIGHT & LEAN‑RIGHT COVERAGE
The Zeitgeist – “How Media Outlets on the Left and Right Covered Biden’s Immigration Order”
A direct comparison of differing ideological frames on immigration policy.
URL:
How Media Outlets on the Left and Right Covered Biden’s Immigration Order
POLITICO – Immigration Reform News Hub
Includes right‑leaning and centrist voices, with heavy focus on congressional battles.
URL:
https://www.politico.com/news/immigration-reform
[politico.com]
AllSides – Media Bias in Immigration Coverage
Analyzes word choice (“illegal,” “undocumented,” etc.) across ideological outlets.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/blog/how-coverage-immigration-reveals-media-bias
[allsides.com]
CBS News Immigration Page
Right‑leaning in story selection relative to AP/CNN; heavy focus on enforcement themes.
URL:
https://www.cbsnews.com/immigration-crisis/
[cbsnews.com]
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON IMMIGRATION & MEDIA EFFECTS
Springer Nature – “Effect of Media News on Radicalization of Attitudes to Immigration”
Examines media influence on public opinion about immigration across 19 countries.
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41996-021-00091-4
[link.springer.com]
Substack
Medium
Wattpad
Spotify
The Trump–Vance Administration may be forced to announce a major strategic change in immigration policies. Here’s what I would like to see in such a revamping of their policies.
The bottom line is simply this
At this point, the Administration must confront a simple reality: it is neither practical nor morally defensible to deport millions of undocumented immigrants who are already woven into the fabric of American life. Many undocumented individuals—and immigrants more broadly—perform essential work across the U.S. economy. From a humanitarian standpoint, it is also unreasonable to remove undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, particularly when there is no evidence of marriage fraud. And the image of masked armed agents kidnapping people off the street, shooting protestors dead, and teargassing children not to mention breaking down doors are a PR nightmare and can not continue. If you don’t want people to call you gestapo, then you should stop acting like the gestapo. It is UnAmerican.
Here are the key ideas distilled into a short summary
- The U.S. immigration system has been dysfunctional for decades and urgently needs modernization.
• Deporting all undocumented immigrants is neither realistic nor humane; many perform essential jobs.
• Families should not be separated when there is no evidence of fraud, especially spouses of citizens and LPRs.
• Like the Reagan-era approach, the U.S. should recognize reality and provide a path to permanent residency, including for Dreamers.
• The system should be simplified with fewer, clearer categories, updated requirements, and modern electronic processing.
• The F4 and Diversity Visa programs should be phased out while creating fair transition rules for those already in the pipeline.
• All new pathways to legal status should include basic English proficiency, education standards, and clean criminal backgrounds.
I have followed immigration issues for decades, both personally and professionally. During my years as a U.S. Government consular officer—including five years working as an immigration fraud officer—I saw firsthand how deeply broken, outdated, and overloaded our immigration system has become. It has not functioned well for a very long time, and the need for fundamental reform has grown only more urgent. We have been here before. President Reagan recognized reality and provided a legalization pathway for those already living in the United States. It is time to show the same clarity and courage today, including offering a path to permanent residency for Dreamers and other long-‑term undocumented residents.
Here are some of my proposals, which I hope will be taken seriously as part of a broader effort to modernize and simplify the system.
The system needs to be significantly streamlined. We have far too many outdated categories that no longer reflect economic needs, humanitarian priorities, or modern mobility patterns.
The F4 sibling category should be abolished going forward, but those already in line should be allowed to proceed by notifying the U.S. Government that they wish to continue and completing all required processing within two years.
The Diversity Visa program should also be phased out. All immigrants— including those who would receive a new pathway to legal status—should meet minimum English-language criteria, possess at least a high-school-level education, and have no criminal background.
Most nonimmigrant visas should be processed electronically. First-time applicants would still visit a U.S. embassy or consulate for biometric collection and a brief interview, but approvals would be issued electronically afterward. Renewals should be completed online without additional interviews. This approach should apply to all visa categories and would dramatically reduce workload and wait times.
A shift in its immigration approach, outlining a new framework intended to balance enforcement with pragmatic pathways to lawful status. The proposal introduces updated enforcement priorities, streamlined visa categories, and a modernized system for both immigrant and non‑immigrant admissions.
1. Enforcement and Humanitarian Provisions
Under the proposal, undocumented immigrants who meet specific criteria will be permitted to apply for temporary status that may later convert to lawful permanent residency (LPR) and eventual citizenship. Eligible applicants must:
- Have no criminal record
• Demonstrate English proficiency
• Maintain employment
• Demonstrate established ties to their community
Applicants will be required to report to DHS within six months to initiate processing.
ICE operations will be refocused toward removing individuals convicted of serious crimes. Consistent with long‑standing practice, ICE officers will not conduct enforcement at schools, churches, courts, or public events. The Administration has indicated that existing Temporary Protected Status (TPS) programs will remain in place for the time being.
The Administration intends to base a comprehensive legislative proposal on the last bipartisan immigration reform bill, with modifications reflecting current conditions.
The Diversity Visa (DV) program will be phased out.
2. Reforms to Immigrant Visa Categories
Family‑ and employment‑based immigration categories will be consolidated into five simplified classifications:
- Immediate Relatives of U.S. Citizens and LPRs
Limited to spouses, parents, and unmarried children under 21 - Employment‑Based Immigrants
Divided into three subcategories:
– Executive/managerial
– Skilled
– Unskilled - Investment‑Based Immigrants
- Religious Workers
- Special Categories as determined by statute
The F4 sibling category will be eliminated moving forward. Those currently in the F4 backlog will have one year to register their intent to proceed and one additional year to complete processing. Applicants will need to demonstrate English language proficiency, a minimum of a high‑school education, and relevant work experience.
Certain serious medical conditions (e.g., cancer, AIDS, MS, tuberculosis) may be grounds for inadmissibility, though waivers may be available. Sexually transmitted infections will result in a temporary exclusion pending completion of treatment.
3. Reforms to Non‑Immigrant Visa Categories
The non‑immigrant visa system will be reorganized as follows:
A — Diplomatic
B — Senior‑level executive travel; B1/B2 intra‑company transfers (INA 214(b) does not apply)
C1 — Tourist
C2 — Business travelers (214(b) applies); includes short‑term work assignments necessary for business operations
D — Temporary workers (skilled, unskilled, and agricultural); 214(b) does not apply; eligible to adjust to LPR status after three years of continuous employment, English proficiency, and a clean record
E — Student visas; graduates with qualifying job offers may adjust status to LPR from within the U.S.; 214(b) does not apply
F — Exchange visitors; may adjust status upon program completion; 214(b) does not apply
G — Performers and athletes, including Olympic participants and individuals joining U.S. teams; eligible to adjust to LPR after one year of employment with a U.S. team or sponsor; 214(b) does not apply
I — Investment visas requiring a minimum $500,000 investment; may adjust to LPR after three years of sustained business viability
R — Religious workers; may adjust to LPR after three years of service
J — Journalists; eligible to adjust to LPR after three years of service
4. Modernized Processing and Administration
- 90% of all visas will be processed through expanded electronic authorization systems.
• First‑time applicants will provide biometric data at U.S. consulates, followed by a streamlined interview.
• Renewals will be completed electronically when possible.
• Per‑country numerical limits will be abolished.
PART 2 — ANALYSIS AND CONTEXT
A. Summary of Major Immigration Reform Proposals (2007–2026)
Across two decades, major reform proposals have generally centered on:
- Border security enhancements (physical barriers, personnel increases, technology upgrades)
• Interior enforcement (E‑Verify, detentions, deportation priorities)
• Legalization pathways for long‑term undocumented residents
• Modernization of employment‑based immigration
• Changes to asylum law
• Backlog reduction via staffing and structural changes
Notable proposals include:
2007 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIRA) — combined enforcement with a path to citizenship; failed in the Senate.
2013 Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act — the “Gang of Eight” bill; passed the Senate but died in the House.
2024–2025 proposals — numerous bipartisan negotiations collapsed amid partisan disagreement, especially around emergency border shutdown authority.
2025 Dignity Act — proposed renewable lawful status for long‑term undocumented residents plus strong border measures.
B. The Last Major Bipartisan Comprehensive Bill
The most recent fully negotiated bipartisan bill was the Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (February 2024).
It included:
- Additional border barriers and detention beds
• Expanded staffing for asylum officers and immigration judges
• Faster asylum adjudication
• Tougher standards for asylum eligibility
• Large increases in fentanyl interdiction funding
• Foreign‑aid funding for Ukraine and Israel
The bill failed in the Senate after heavy opposition from Republican leadership.
C. Press Coverage Across the Political Spectrum
Left‑leaning outlets generally emphasize humanitarian concerns, due‑process issues, asylum protections, and the risks of aggressive enforcement.
Common themes: court‑backlog consequences, concerns about detention, and critiques of expedited removal.
Center‑left/centrist outlets (AP, Bloomberg, major networks) focus on factual reporting:
• system backlogs
• operational changes
• legislative deadlock
• economic impacts of immigration flows
Right‑leaning outlets highlight:
• border security failures
• increased encounters
• enforcement gaps
• the need for restrictive asylum policies
International press emphasizes:
• U.S. political volatility
• Effects on global migration flows
• Diplomatic implications
• Labor‑market and demographic impacts
D. Visa Issuances, Five‑Year Trends
Non‑immigrant visas recovered sharply after COVID and exceeded pre‑pandemic levels:
- FY2023: 10.4 million
• FY2024: 10.97 million (highest ever recorded)
Immigrant visas remained relatively stable from 2020–2024, averaging around 700k–1.1 million per year.
E. Immigration Backlogs and Wait Times
- USCIS pending cases (2025): 11.3 million
• Immigration court backlog (late 2025): 3.7 million cases
• Average immigration court wait time: ~4 years
• Longest family‑based queues (F1, F2B, F3, F4): 7–22+ years, depending on country
• Employment‑based processing often requires 1–3 years, depending on category and demand
• Naturalization processing reduced modestly to ~5.5 months avg. in 2024–25
F. Have Visa Numbers Declined Since the Start of Trump’s Second Term?
Based on available data (2023–2025 and early 2026):
- Non‑immigrant visas: No — they remained historically high (2024 was a record year).
• Immigrant visas: Mixed — slight declines in some categories due to backlog pressure, not policy cuts.
• Asylum and humanitarian processing: Declines observed due to policy slowdowns and suspensions.
Overall, no evidence suggests a broad decline in routine visa issuances driven solely by the administration.
G. Probability of Immigration Reform in the Near Term
Prospects remain low, based on:
- A sharply divided Congress
• Party disagreement over sequencing (enforcement first vs. comprehensive approach)
• Presidential election dynamics
• Senate filibuster constraints
• Prior bipartisan negotiations repeatedly collapsing under political pressure
However, targeted reforms (border security funding, limited employment‑based changes, TPS adjustments) remain possible.
“Sources and Further Reading: Press Coverage Across the Spectrum”
LEFT & LEAN‑LEFT COVERAGE
AllSides – “Shaping the Narrative: How Major Media Outlets Cover Immigration”
A data‑driven breakdown of how left‑leaning outlets frame immigration issues.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/blog/shaping-narrative-how-major-media-outlets-cover-immigration
[allsides.com]
Pew Research Center – Biden‑era Immigration Coverage
Compares story volume and tone across political audiences.
URL:
CNN Politics – Immigration News Page
Consistent coverage of immigration, deportations, asylum rules, and humanitarian issues.
URL:
https://www.cnn.com/politics/immigration
[cnn.com]
The Conversation – Immigration Policy Research & Commentary
Academic‑oriented articles on immigration, migration flows, and policy impacts.
URL:
https://theconversation.com/topics/immigration-policy-6888
[theconversation.com]
CENTER / NEUTRAL COVERAGE
AllSides Immigration Topic Page
Aggregates balanced headline roundups with stories from multiple viewpoints.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/topics/immigration
[allsides.com]
JSTOR – “Coverage and Framing of Immigration Policy in U.S. Newspapers”
Peer‑reviewed analysis on how mainstream newspapers frame immigration policy.
URL:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/48663967
[jstor.org]
RIGHT & LEAN‑RIGHT COVERAGE
The Zeitgeist – “How Media Outlets on the Left and Right Covered Biden’s Immigration Order”
A direct comparison of differing ideological frames on immigration policy.
URL:
How Media Outlets on the Left and Right Covered Biden’s Immigration Order
POLITICO – Immigration Reform News Hub
Includes right‑leaning and centrist voices, with heavy focus on congressional battles.
URL:
https://www.politico.com/news/immigration-reform
[politico.com]
AllSides – Media Bias in Immigration Coverage
Analyzes word choice (“illegal,” “undocumented,” etc.) across ideological outlets.
URL:
https://www.allsides.com/blog/how-coverage-immigration-reveals-media-bias
[allsides.com]
CBS News Immigration Page
Right‑leaning in story selection relative to AP/CNN; heavy focus on enforcement themes.
URL:
https://www.cbsnews.com/immigration-crisis/
[cbsnews.com]
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON IMMIGRATION & MEDIA EFFECTS
Springer Nature – “Effect of Media News on Radicalization of Attitudes to Immigration”
Examines media influence on public opinion about immigration across 19 countries.
URL:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41996-021-00091-4
[link.springer.com]